Monthly Archives: June 2018

Bullying Partakers: Writing Prompts

 Bullying Stops Here

Let us find out in our writing the typological features of partakers of bullying. There are following features of the partakers.

Persecutor

Define in writing that “persecutors” with low sociometric status have the highest satisfaction rate in the communication, they are clearly aware of the social circle in which they are accepted. They are significantly more authoritarian than other partakers of the bullying. This feature helps them to subordinate “helpers,” it is an internal justification during “persecution” of victims and creates a sense of subjective rightness. “Persecutors,” despite their role, consider themselves too good; they want to be even less good than they are. Also, the “persecutors” do not seek to be patient. In general, the “persecutors” have fairly high level of self-esteem and a lot of pretensions.

Victim

Bullying Victim

Point out in writing that the “victims” have the lowest sociometric status and satisfaction rate in the communication. It shows their low position in the class. “Victims” are the most dependent, “weak” in comparison with other partakers of bullying. Self-concept of the “victims” is the lowest in comparison with other groups, and the level of pretensions is quite high, so the “victim” is very unhappy, they do not accept themselves and perhaps want to change. Levels of anxiety, difficulties in communication and conflicts are the highest among the “victims.”

Helper

They have a fairly low sociometric status. Specify in writing that they do not achieve respect in the classroom. “Helpers” are very dependent. It makes them subordination subject to the “persecutors,” but at the same time, they are sufficiently authoritarian, which creates an internal discomfort in them. “Helpers” have the highest rate of active direct bullying, as they are often name-calling, hitting, and “persecutors” just choose a goal and think over a plan. “Helpers” are experiencing an acute shortage of communication with their fathers. Perhaps they find out the father qualities in the “persecutors,” and therefore seek to help them even in persecution. “Helpers” have average indicators of self-concept to the level of pretensions.

Defender

Defender Bullying

Inform us due to your writing that “defenders” have the highest sociometric status and relatively high satisfaction rate in communication, i.e., they are generally satisfied with the occupied position, which is also quite high. They more rarely than others manifest bullying towards classmates and are bullied. It confirms the correctness of dividing into groups. The “defenders” have a fairly high self-concept, especially in terms of reliability and understanding. Ideally, they want to be very good, kindness to them is a constant value. These features allow them to understand the “victims,” sympathize and help them.

Neutral Participants

Pay attention in writing that “neutral partakers” have enough high sociometric status and awareness rate of positive relations. They are the least dependent, which allows them not to interfere in the conflicts. They just look from the side, but it is not always a good thing. “Neutral partakers” are viewers, for whom performance is played. In many respects, their inaction provokes bullying. Furthermore, “persecutors” are often only executors of the will of “neutral partakers.” They have the highest level of pretensions by “tolerance” quality. This once again confirms the correctness of dividing into groups. Only tolerance allows them to stay away from the conflict.